The Streisand Effect: What it Means for Corporate and Public Communication

The Streisand Effect: What it Means for Corporate and Public Communication

Have you ever tried to hide something and ended up making it more popular? That’s the essence of the Streisand Effect — when efforts to suppress information actually draw more attention to it.

What is the Streisand Effect?

A few years ago, Barbra Streisand tried to block photos of her house from being published. Instead of hiding the pictures, it made them more known. This phenomenon shows that trying to censor or hide information can backfire, causing even more people to see what you wanted to keep quiet.

Why does this matter for corporate and public communicators?

Recently, the Trump administration avoided answering questions about certain issues. Often, when organizations or governments stay silent, it can have the opposite effect. People become more curious, and rumours or misinformation can spread faster.

What can we learn?

• Be transparent. Open, honest communication builds trust and reduces the chance of rumours taking hold.

• Think ahead. Trying to hide bad news can make it bigger. A proactive message can prevent this.

• Stay consistent. Clear and steady messaging helps control the story, rather than allowing uncertainty to grow.

Broader lesson for everyone:

If you try to hide something, be prepared for it to get more attention. Whether you're a business leader or just someone sharing information online, honesty and transparency are often the best strategies to keep control of the story.

#crisiscommunications #mediarelations #mediatraining #transparency #proactive #keymessaging #spokesperson #streisand